Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
03/21/2023 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Confirmation Hearing(s): Department of Family and Community Services | |
HB57 | |
HB46 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+ | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 46-CHILD CARE PROVIDER COLLECTIVE BARGAINING 4:16:16 PM CHAIR PRAX announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 46, "An Act allowing child care providers that receive state aid to organize and collectively bargain with the Department of Health; and establishing the child care provider fund." [Before the committee was CSHB 46 (L&C).] 4:17:53 PM CANDACE RICHEY, Owner, Candi's Tot Stop, shared that she has been in business at Candy's Tot Stop for 17 years. She said that providers get asked what they need, but when they talk, they are not heard. She said that HB 46 offers support to providers. She thanked members who helped pass similar legislation through the House last year, which she said was then blocked by one senator; however, with new leadership in the senate, there is now an opportunity to get childcare legislation to the governor. She explained that the bill covers topics of concern in the childcare industry in Alaska, including wages, provider voice, benefits, and retirement. She said that the wages earned in the industry are hard to live off, and there is high staff turnover because providers can't afford to pay their employees higher wages. She shared that her wait list consists of many service members needing care, showing how the lack of childcare is impacting preparedness. She explained that benefits are not possible because of the unaffordable premiums to get insurance as a small business. She said that the bill will give providers a say as to where the state funds go for childcare. 4:21:56 PM BRIAN HOLST, Executive Director, Juneau Economic Development Council, explained that childcare is an important economic development issue for the state and provides a high return on public investment. He said that high quality early care is critical, and that the Heckman curve shows that investment has diminishing returns as the child gets older. He stated that the lack of childcare hurts the economy, and that chamber of commerce data from 2019 showed that $165 million is lost annually in the Alaska economy due to child care related issues, and that 77 percent of Alaska parents missed school or work for child care in a three-month period; 36 percent of Alaska parents postpone school or training due to such issues; and 47 percent of families rely on other family or friends for childcare. He said that every state ranks childcare readiness, and that two- thirds of the state's students are not ready for kindergarten. He explained that the Journal of Education Psychology identified that, if 50 first graders have problems reading, 44 of them still have problems reading by the time they are in fourth grade. He stated that a lack of access to affordable high- quality childcare has an impact on the workforce, and that while employers want more childcare options, there are significant barriers such as cost and scarcity. He explained that the current model of childcare in the state is broken, as wages are uncompetitive since many could earn more in an entry level retail job instead. He pointed out that operators are small due to cost of rent and requirements around child to adult ratios, and that programs cannot raise wages without increasing prices. 4:27:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked, with CSHB 46(L&C) adding tax incentives to childcare services, what Mr. Holst thinks would the uptake be. MR. HOLST answered that, when businesses were surveyed, they said they are interested in supporting childcare operations, but the challenge is the size of the business. 4:28:43 PM REPRESENTATIVE ZACK FIELDS, Alaska State Legislature, as prime sponsor, thanked the committee for hearing HB 46. He explained that that CSHB 46(L&C) has three provisions: Establish opportunity for childcare providers to enter intersectoral bargaining with the state, which would allow them to manage money for the state for investing money; establish a child care trust fund, which would allow saving some money to trickle out to pay for child care; and add tax credits for companies if they give out vouchers for existing childcare or build on-site childcare. 4:32:46 PM REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER asked what other states experienced with intersectoral bargaining agreements. REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS explained that the legislature only has the ability to implement sectoral bargaining for childcare or farmwork, as those are the only two areas excluded from the National Labor Relations Act. He said that 10 states have implemented such framework, some were successful and sustained. He shared that last year the House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee heard from providers in Washington state, which has such bargaining; providers in Washington described how, over time, they built up the profession to a living wage and thereby increasing the supply of labor and childcare. 4:35:28 PM EVAN ANDERSON, Staff, Representative Zack Fields, Alaska State Legislature on behalf of prime sponsor Representative Fields, read the sectional analysis for HB 46[included in committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: Section 1: This section amends AS 23.05.360(f) to allow the Alaska Labor Relations Agency board in the Department of Labor & Workforce Development the authority to include workers in the child care sector for the purpose of holding hearings. This is a conforming change to language added in Sec 4. Section 2: This section amends AS 23.05.370(a) to direct the Alaska Labor Relations Agency to serve as labor relations agency for workers in the child care sector covered by the new language added in Sec. 4. Section 3: This section amends AS 23.05.380 to give Department of Labor & Workforce Development the authority to update regulations pertaining to collective bargaining rights for workers in the child care sector. This is a conforming change to language added in Sec 4. Section 4: This section amends AS 23.40 to give child care providers the right to self-organize, join, or assist an organization to bargain collectively and engage in concerted activities for the purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. This section prohibits the Department of Health from engaging in unfair labor practices, and it provides a process for investigation and conciliation of complaints. This section also provides definitions. Section 5: This section establishes a child care provider fund as a separate fund in the state treasury. This section also establishes a child care stakeholder group to recommend disbursements from the fund. 4:41:59 PM CHAIR PRAX mentioned that New Mexico has a $2 billion trust fund for childcare. He asked if such a fund is designated or dedicated. REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said he does not know if New Mexico has the same designated fund restrictions as Alaska, and in talking with Legislative Legal Services, the key phrase is "funds do not last". He said there were hundreds of millions of additional dollars last year, and there were $400 million put towards capital funding, as an example. CHAIR PRAX pointed out that the fiscal note contemplates just an annual appropriation. 4:43:57 PM MR. ANDERSON explained that the bill's two fiscal notes, one from the Department of Health and another from the Department of Revenue, clearly lay out protected deficits around the tax credit program. 4:44:56 PM BRANDON SPANOS, Deputy Director, Tax Division, Department of Revenue, answered that there were three parts to the reduction of revenue; there is no data on broadening what is allowed to be an expenditure on credits and how many companies would take advantage of that; there is data on expanding the program to $3 million, and companies regular contribute more they can take as a credit; there is also data on extending the sunset date. CHAIR PRAX asked if that then is only the anticipated loss in tax revenue because the companies would donate money to the program. MR. SPANOS answered that's correct. CHAIR PRAX asked if the tax credit is one-for-one, and if it would be reasonable to assume that the money would go into the childcare fund. MR. SPANOS explained that the tax credit in current statute has changed over the years, but in the first year, the first $100,000, 50 percent is applied to the credit, therefore, a 5:1 ratio. CHAIR PRAX inquired as to whether the proposed $15 million appropriation to trust fund would be draining the fund each year. 4:48:39 PM REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS offered that a $15 million fund could be managed, but it wouldn't be sufficiently large to make a difference in the sector; however, it could be something to establish and be built up over time. 4:48:55 PM CHAIR PRAX announced that HB 46 was held over.